Anthropic Claude Partner
Everyone has an AI strategy slide. Almost nobody has AI that actually does the work. We build the second kind — production-grade, on Anthropic's Claude, from Bengaluru to Dubai to Sydney.
I'm InterestedThe honest math
We could paste a chart that says AI grows 400% by next Tuesday. Instead, here's ours.
Two live products is where Prism Automate starts, not where the track record does. We're the AI arm of the Prism family — 589+ shipped projects, a 4.9/5 average across them, for teams from Google and Unisys to PhonePe and Air India. The discipline that shipped those is the discipline we point at Claude.
What we do with Claude
The eight we build most on Claude. Pick the one keeping you up at night; we'll start there — the full fourteen are one click away.
Where Claude earns its keep, in what order, with numbers your board can read without a translator.
One governed platform. Every team ships agents on it. Your engineers own it, we don't rent it back to you.
Concierges, chatbots, and features that survive the open internet, not just a friendly demo on a good day.
Claude on the phone, with human-like turn-taking. Every call transcribed, logged to your CRM, and measured.
Point Claude at the boring, expensive, 40-tab workflows. Watch them quietly stop being either.
Move a workload onto Claude without breaking what already works. Proven side-by-side before anything switches.
We carry the pager; you get the report. Monitoring, evals, and SLAs a vendor will actually sign.
Turn "we have licences" into "we actually use them," role by role, on your real work, not toy prompts.
What you can actually ship
Support that runs 24/7 and gets sharper with every conversation, not dumber. It reads your docs, talks to your systems, and hands the hard ones to a human before the customer notices.
The 200-email, copy-paste-into-a-spreadsheet workflow that eats someone's Monday? Claude reads it, classifies it, extracts it, and syncs it back — with an audit trail, so finance stays calm.
Prototype, test, ship. Claude does the grunt work; your team does the judgement. You go from "cool idea" to "in front of real users" while your competitor is still booking the kickoff.
Why Prism, not a chatbot wrapper
We're an Anthropic Claude partner. We build on the model on purpose — we don't bolt onto one we don't understand and hope for the best.
Latency, fallbacks, safety, evals, prompt-injection defence. It has to survive real users on a bad day, not a scripted demo on a good one.
One accountable team from the first roadmap to the pager at 2am. No hand-offs, no finger-pointing, no "that's the other vendor."
Why Claude, specifically
Claude holds a long, complex brief and does what the brief says — which is the whole game for agents that touch real systems. When it isn't sure, it says so instead of inventing an answer, and that honesty is what lets us put it in front of customers and finance alike.
Whole repositories, hundred-page contracts, a sprawling support history — Claude keeps the thread. That is why the workloads we build on it, from document intelligence to repo-aware coding, hold up on the real inputs rather than the tidy demo ones.
As an Anthropic Claude partner we build on the model deliberately — tracking what each Claude generation does well, tuning consumption so the bill stays sane, and defending the edges with prompt-injection controls and evals. We know this model's behaviour because we ship on it every week.
Tell us what's eating your team's time — a workflow, a queue, a phone line no one wants to staff. On a first call we'll tell you honestly whether Claude can kill it, what it would take, and what it shouldn't touch. You'll leave with a straight answer either way, not a proposal to schedule the proposal. A real person, usually Arun, replies within one business day. No deck required; bad handwriting on a napkin is fine.
I'm Interested