Strategy & Advisory
A paid assessment of how ready your organisation is for Claude — data, security, skills, and governance. You leave with a scored verdict, a risk register, and a plan to close the gaps.
Scope this with usData, security, skills, and process maturity scored against what a live Claude rollout actually demands, not a generic maturity matrix.
Usage policies, review gates, and escalation paths that satisfy legal without strangling teams.
The failure modes that matter in your industry — data leakage, hallucinated output, shadow usage — each with a concrete mitigation, not a heat map.
An honest map of what's already happening off the books — the teams pasting customer data into public chatbots, the unsanctioned tools, the workarounds — because you can't govern what you can't see, and the risk you don't know about is the one that bites.
Structured interviews and a systems review across security, data, and the teams who'll use Claude daily.
Findings scored against readiness criteria proven on real rollouts, ranked by what to fix first.
Policies, review gates, and a remediation plan ordered by risk — ready to hand straight to compliance.
The opposite. The point is guardrails that let teams move faster with confidence — usage policies, review gates, and escalation paths that satisfy legal without becoming a bottleneck.
Yes. We build the risk register and paper trail around your specific obligations, so 'we use AI carefully' becomes something that survives an audit.
Typically two to three weeks. The load on your teams is a handful of scheduled interviews and read-only access to the systems we review — no freeze on work, no tooling to install. You get the scored verdict and remediation plan at the end, not a months-long audit that outlives its own findings.